Recipe Box
 
Welcome to GSN's Recipe Box where you can search for recipes, save time with weekly meal plans and much more!

Search by Recipe Name Search by Ingredients

My Preferences - Sign In
Register for free recipes by email, save your dietary preferences, favorite recipes and more!

Recipe of the Day

Mocha Meringue Cookies

Special Diet Recipes
Low Fat, Vegetarian, more…

Cuisines
Mexican, Italian, more…

Main Dish Recipes
Chicken, Pasta, Pork, more…

Dessert Recipes
Cake, Chocolate, Fruit, Cookies, more…

Appetizer Recipes
Shrimp, Crab, more…

Ask the Chef

Click here to ask a Question!

Q. Can fresh pasta be made without eggs? If so, recipe please.

A. Here's what Christian Teubner, author of The Pasta Bible, has to say on the subject: "Pasta dough consisting only of flour and water is made much better in factories than it can ever be at home." He says factories have better access to special varieties of flour and the machinery to manipulate it adequately. So technically, he leaves the door open for flour-and-water pastas, but he sure doesn't provide any recipes for eggless pasta. Neither does Marcella Hazan or the authors of many of the other cookbooks sagging on our overburdened Italian shelves.

But Guiliano Bugialli, author of numerous Italian cookbooks including The Fine Art of Italian Cooking says pasta from the area around Genoa has traditionally been eggless. The pasta he presents is called trenette, which, he says, is commonly confused with tagliatelle or fettuccine (flat strips about 1/4-inch wide), but which is significantly different in two ways: one edge is curly and there are no eggs in the dough. And while packaged pasta is replacing fresh all too often in Genoa these days, he says he still knows people "of the older generation" who make fresh trenette.

The ingredients for trenette are 2-1/2 cups unbleached all-purpose flour, 1 cup of cold water, 2 teaspoons of olive oil, and a pinch of salt. The pasta can be made by hand, the same as a pasta with eggs, by making a well in the flour on a flat surface, putting the water, oil and salt into the well, and gradually incorporating the flour into the wet ingredients. Once the mixture has come together, knead it until you have a smooth ball. You can also make it in a food processor. Once the dough is formed, roll it by hand or using a pasta machine. Then, if you want to be authentic — and who doesn't? — you cut it by hand, using a knife on one side of each strip and a jagged pastry cutter on the other. A traditional dressing for this pasta is pesto.


Q. Many flourless cake recipes call for using a springform pan and putting that pan into a water bath. After my first disaster, (the water leaked in and ruined the cake), I decided to do a test and see if tinfoil would work. Before pouring in the batter, I double-wrapped the pan with tin foil from top to bottom and put it into a water bath. I used something to weigh down the pan so that the water would come halfway up the sides. I checked it a half hour later and the water had already leaked into the springform pan. Is using a regular, not-springform pan the only solution to this? And better yet, can I skip it altogether and just put a pan of water on a rack under the rack where the cake pan is?

A. We approached your question from several angles before zeroing in on some possible solutions.

A flourless cake (many of which are out-and-out lies and include a few tablespoons of flour) relies on eggs and other squishy ingredients to give it structure, and requires gentle cooking to allow the center to set before the outside becomes dry and inedible. Some recipes recommend placing the pan in a water bath, in which the cake pan is set in a larger pan, with water coming about halfway up the sides of the cake pan. This tempers the cooking significantly, because no matter how hot the oven is, the temperature of the water cannot rise above 212°F (100°C). Putting the pan of water on a lower rack under the cake pan would defeat the purpose and leave the cake at the mercy of the much hotter oven air.

Putting a springform pan in a water bath does indeed present problems. Someone on the staff here suggested that it is all a question of the quality of the springform pan. A good pan wouldn't leak, this person said. So we asked the folks at Kaiser Bakeware, who make a line of high-quality springform pans. Their answer? "Our springform pans are not made to be used in a waterbath," a spokeswoman said. So that's out.

Now, we all know that if you have a large sheet of aluminum foil that covers the bottom of the pan completely and comes well up the sides, and as long as you are gentle enough with it and don't puncture it, it will keep water out. If you don't put a hole in the foil, the water won't come in. As a practical matter, though, we've seen lots of recipes that call for you to wrap a springform pan with two layers of foil, so apparently they know how rough you are and that you are likely to cause a leak. It does work, we've used it ourselves, but it's a nuisance and a mess.

Our solution is to find another recipe. We came across two in the ucook.com database that address the problem in different ways. The first, Flourless Chocolate Cake, uses a regular cake pan, which is well greased and dusted with flour (or cocoa), and has a layer of parchment paper at the bottom of the pan, which is also buttered and floured. The cake is still baked in a water bath, but without the mess. Another option with an equally catchy name, Flourless Chocolate Cake keeps the springform pan but omits the water bath, and cooks the cake for 3 hours in a low-temperature oven (250°F, 120°C). Take your pick, or sign up for that adult ed. class on the ancient art of aluminum-foil origami.


Q. I have a baron of beef roast (inside round) that is 910 grams in weight. My question is how long and at what temp. do I cook it in order for the meat to be medium-rare to medium? I do not yet own a meat thermometer.

A. Your question is a little tricky, because a baron of beef in Britain is a lovely (usually large) cut of meat associated with the sirloins. In the US, a baron of beef is an imprecise term used to describe large, less important cuts that are better-suited to braising. And inside round is not a common name for a cut in the US. So we'll assume that your baron is British and that roasting is the ideal method. If you cook your 2-pound roast at 325°F (160°C or Gas Mark 3), it should be medium-rare after about 1-1/2 hours. Add 15 minutes if you want medium. In either case, remember to let the meat rest for about 15 minutes after you take it out of the oven before carving.

And our meek and well-intentioned suggestion to you is to eat ground beef for a couple of weeks and buy a meat thermometer with the money you save.

Click here to ask a Question!


Privacy | Disclosure | Help | About Us
©2002 GSN. All Rights Reserved.